[MlMt] Sorting by date received...

[Bill Cole]

On 6 Oct 2015, at 17:44, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:

> On 6 Oct 2015, at 23:33, Seebs wrote:
>
>> I would sort of prefer for "there is no date available" to be 
>> replaced with either Some Other Date, or treated as newer than any 
>> date rather than older than any date. Some mail (thus far, 
>> exclusively spam) comes in with no date header, and if I have an 
>> inbox sorted by date received, it gets shoved to the far bottom, 
>> which is inconvenient.
>
> Agreed. As far as I can see then this would only happen if a message 
> has neither Date header nor any Received headers. I guess I should 
> just make “Date Received” default to the current date (the first 
> time MailMate sees it).

I had always assumed "Date Received" was the IMAP "INTERNALDATE" since 
that's always available and should be when the message was delivered...