[MlMt] Reply-To broken in r3502?

[Benny Kjær Nielsen]

On 24 Jun 2013, at 16:04, Bill Cole wrote:

> I tried replying to a message today with a syntactically valid 
> Reply-To today and was startled to see that MM ignored it, putting the 
> "From" of the original in the To field and not even popping up the 
> dialog that sometimes offers reply options. The only unusual thing 
> about this message is that it was programmatically generated by a CGI 
> behind a web contact form which protects against backscatter spam by 
> using one local address in both the From and To headers and as the 
> SMTP envelope sender and recipient (causing the local mail system to 
> put it in Return-Path and X-Original-To as well.)
>
> I have not yet tested with other messages, but since my own MM config 
> is the product of many untracked customizations under the hood across 
> many versions, it is conceivable that I've found some odd corner case 
> specific to my rig. Has anyone else on the list noticed this?

I think I fixed a reply-related bug some time ago, but maybe I 
introduced a new one (although I do have some automated reply tests).

You can try sending me the headers of the message if possible. Maybe 
something triggers a bug in the parsing/handling of the Reply-To header.

-- 
Benny