[MlMt] Thread sorting

[Steve Mayer]

Kee,

   You do have the 'Unread' smart mailbox as a sanity check here for 
those unread messages.

-- 
Steve Mayer
smayer69 at me.com

On 3 Dec 2013, at 10:50, Kee Hinckley wrote:

> On 3 Dec 2013, at 11:09, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
>
>> On 3 Dec 2013, at 17:01, Kee Hinckley wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't a thread sort by the most recent message, rather than the 
>>> oldest? I was looking for a mail message I knew had arrived recently 
>>> and couldn't find it because it was underneath the original message, 
>>> which arrived several weeks ago.
>>
>> MailMate uses a strict threading model. If two messages are shown as 
>> parent/child then it's because the child is a reply to the parent. 
>> This model cannot be reversed (or it would make little sense). The 
>> only variation I can
>
> That makes sense to me. The current model makes it really easy to lose 
> messages. My inbox has thousands of messages, with lots I haven't 
> gotten to reading. So if someone replies to something old, I'm not 
> going to notice unless it appears in my recent messages unless I 
> switch to unthreaded mode, which I really would rather not 
> do._______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate at lists.freron.com
> http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate