[MlMt] Still confused about rules
Antonio Leding
tech at leding.net
Tue Apr 8 19:05:51 EDT 2025
I don’t understand why SMBOX-2; simply apply the delete rule to the
SMBOX-1. Why is that a bad idea?
- - -
On 8 Apr 2025, at 15:55, Randy Abbott wrote:
>> What are you actually seeing happen at Rule 2? Perhaps there is some
>> relationship between the Rules that is missing. Can you be more
>> specific on the settings, pls.
>
> The code formatting seems to not have come through.
>
> "Smart Mailbox 2" is a sub-mailbox of "Smart Mailbox 1" and "Rule" is
> attached to "Smart Mailbox 2".
>
> I would expect for "Smart Mailbox 2" to always be empty because any
> messages that fall into it would be deleted by the rule (i.e., a
> message is 15-days old and falls into "Smart Mailbox 2" and the rule
> evaluates the message and permanetly deletes it). However, that is not
> the case for me. Messages older than 14 days appear in "Smart Mailbox
> 2" and is never deleted by the rule.
>
> Deleted Messages
> __Smart Mailbox 1 [Filters for email at example.com]
> ____Smart Mailbox 2 [Filters for messages received not within the last
> 14 days]
> _______Rule [Permanently deletes messages received not within the last
> 14 days]
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freron.com/pipermail/mailmate/attachments/20250408/31e0a60b/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the mailmate
mailing list