[MlMt] date condition mismatches

[John D. Muccigrosso]

> On 8 Jun 2015, at 17:33, Shoshanna Green wrote:
>
> Today I have another instance of the issue I described a month ago (as 
> well as it still persisting in the smart mailbox I created last 
> month):
>
> Sorry about the late response.
>
> a message was sent this morning and arrived this morning, June 8, but 
> MailMate does not find it in a smart mailbox if the date condition on 
> that mailbox is set to “exactly 6/8/2015.” Instead, it finds it if 
> the date condition is set to “exactly 6/7/2015.”
>
> Note that “Date” is actually the date relative to the location of 
> the sender. For example, the message you sent me has this date:
>
>         Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:33:38 -0400
>
> The received date is the same in this case, but it’s time is 
> different (17:33 due to my location), but in theory the date could 
> also have been different.
>
> I think you can get what you want if you use “Date-Received” (via 
> Other…) instead of “Date”.
>
> (Maybe MailMate should behave differently with respect to the date 
> header, but it’s always tricky to get these things right making it 
> work well for all use cases.)

Apologies for again resurrecting an old thread, but I wanted to add that 
my assumption was that “date” meant “date received”, which is 
perhaps naive of me. A request for making the “date received” option 
visible by default and next to date.


John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freron.com/pipermail/mailmate/attachments/20160707/98f5b55a/attachment.html>