[MlMt] THANKS!

[Benny Kjær Nielsen]

On 9 Feb 2016, at 23:03, Mark Derricutt wrote:

> On 10 Feb 2016, at 10:51, Scott A. McIntyre wrote:
>
>> ${#source.path.noinbox}
>>
>> However, the ".noinbox" isn't recognised for some reason, so, 
>> changing the Submailbox to be based on Source -> Path, and modifying 
>> the format to:
>>
>> ${#source.path}
>>
>> At least lets me see the values again.
>
> I was just about to post the exact same answer! Turns out I had some 
> mailboxes setup with `${#source.path}` and some with 
> `${#source.path.noindex}` which made things even more confusing for me 
> this morning for a moment :)

The `.noinbox` specifier is a horrible hack to get around the 
“issue” of some servers prefixing INBOX to all mailbox paths (a 
so-called namespace). This is often not desired when displaying mailbox 
paths.

I forgot about this when optimizing the parsing of the virtual `#source` 
header (faster startup times for large message stores).

-- 
Benny
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freron.com/pipermail/mailmate/attachments/20160210/1add60c4/attachment.html>