[MlMt] Smart Folder Conditions not filtering as expected
Helen Holzgrafe
helen at holzgrafe.com
Sat Feb 21 15:47:56 EST 2015
Thanks.
Last week I was asking about a way to see what Smart Folders a message
was filtering into. I was beginning to suspect I was seeing some kind
of bug in the Smart Folder logic. I finally traced it to this, but it
took a bit of digging without that capability because I have close to
400000 messages.
I have now tested "Unquoted Body Text" and "Subject" separately as you
pointed out that "Common Headers or Body" is a combination of those plus
"Any Address". I have two kinds of messages that are failing: one has
MySpecialWord in the unquoted body and the other has it in the subject.
I didn't really test "Any Address" because MySpecialWord isn't in any
addresses.
Messages with MySpecialWord in the Unquoted Body:
Unquoted Body Text does not contain MySpecialWord -> fails
Unquoted Body Text contains MySpecialWord -> works correctly
Common Headers or Body does not contain MySpecialWord -> fails
Common Headers or Body contains MySpecialWord -> works correctly
These fail the same way. They will correctly filter for "contains", but
do not filter at all for "does not contain" as far as I can tell (at
least for these messages).
Messages with MySpecialWord in the Subject:
Subject does not contain MySpecialWord -> works correctly
Subject contains MySpecialWord -> works correctly
Common Headers or Body does not contain MySpecialWord -> fails
Common Headers or Body contain MySpecialWord -> works correctly
The failure for "Subject" seems only to be in when using "Common Headers
or Body".
I hope this helps narrow down the problem. I can send you some test
messages if you want them.
-Helen
On 21 Feb 2015, at 4:34, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2015, at 22:18, Helen Holzgrafe wrote:
>
>> All
>> Common Headers or body does not contain MySpecialWord
>> Common Headers or body does not contain MySpecialWord2
>>
>> This does not work as I expect and I get all messages from both
>> domains in this Smart Folder.
>>
>> Am I missing something crucial?
>
> No, I don't think it works as it should. I'll look into it.
>
>> I am running 1.9 (5063). Should I go back to a previous version to
>> see if it works better there?
>
> No, I think you would then be going back to something much less
> robust. You might be able to split it up to make it work. “Common
> Headers or body” corresponds to “Any Address”, “Unquoted Body
> Text”, and “Subject”.
>
> --
> Benny
> _______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate at lists.freron.com
> http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freron.com/pipermail/mailmate/attachments/20150221/c0d19470/attachment.html>
More information about the mailmate
mailing list