[MlMt] Threads and sorting

[Marc ARC]

Kee,

Have you tried the following:

On your IMAP-source set a condition ( double click the source mailbox ):

	[All] of the following are true
			[Trhead-Id]    [is in]      [IMAP-Source>INBOX]    [Thread-Id]

When you then select the IMAP source you’ll see only what’s in the 
Inbox and all mails that are in relation to the thread.

We archive, what came in our Inbox, as soon as we ‘ve handled it. So 
our Inbox contains only what needs to be done.

You can of course also obtain the same resulting smart mailbox, but we 
took this approach because we are monitoring a large number of different 
IMAP boxes and we feel this is the easiest way, we want to limit the 
number of boxes/folders.

You can easily make alternatives to this by, instead of referring to the 
Source_Inbox, make a reference to a smart mailbox that only contains the 
message you want to see ( ex: unseen, flagged, today’s, . . . )


Succes.


Marc


On 19 Mar 2014, at 16:50, Kee Hinckley wrote:

> Is there any chance that when thread identification rules are relaxed 
> to catch more cases, they will also sort by the most recent item in 
> the thread?
>
> I am constantly losing old threads. It's not so bad while the items 
> are unread, because at least I can see that somewhere up in my 
> messages there must be a new one. But as soon as I read one, it's 
> gone. I regularly run with a large inbox (my work inbox has 2,874 
> messages right now). If someone replies to something I wrote several 
> weeks ago, and I glance at it to comeback later--it's off my radar.
>
> Yes. Using your inbox to manage priorities. Bad idea. Inbox zero. Good 
> idea. But it's my 
> reality._______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate at lists.freron.com
> http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate