[MlMt] Evaluation results

[Barton Lipman]

For someone who is so particular, why is this one of the testimonials on 
your website?

> Produce & Publish server:
>
> We justed finished writing our brochure texts through the web and some 
> seconds later we could hold the print-ready PDF document in our hands  
> - very impressing. Just a blink of an eye away and the PDF was ready - 
> this this the fascination of this publishing solution.

There's no need to harass people on a public mailing list who subscribe 
in order to keep up with new ideas for software they like.  If you don't 
like it, please communicate with the developer off this mailing list or 
just don't buy the software.

Thank you.

Bart



On 19 May 2015, at 11:38, Andreas Jung wrote:

> On 19 May 2015, at 17:27, Ben Klebe wrote:
>
>>> I don't care about a discount and I don't care about 50 EUR. I care 
>>> about a working work environment and
>>> I take the freedom to complain about software that has obvious bugs. 
>>> I am software developer myself and I am annoyed to see so many 
>>> little obvious and open issues in your software in a 1.9 release. I 
>>> have not seen this in any other Mac software so far. Either some 
>>> features are not very well thought or just badly implement
>>> or just to generic in order to make it right (the rules engine gives 
>>> me exactly this feeling).
>>>
>>> -aj
>>
>>
>>
>> Furthermore, MailMate offers classes of features that are unavailable 
>> in other mail clients, and even the ability to request more of these 
>> features and amendments to these features directly with a prompt and 
>> polite response. The bugs you have pointed out are non-obvious at 
>> best and edge cases at worst.
>
> Counters showing improper numbers of unread messages an edge case?
> Non persistent column settings an edge case?
> Simple email rules something working and sometimes not an edge case?
>
> Seriously?
>
>> For a single developer the fact that it works at all is quite 
>> impressive, especially in such an archaic language as Objective-C. 
>> I'm sure you realize that. You don't have the right to complain about 
>> bugs in software you do not own. If it really peeved you that your 
>> trial had so many bugs, you could have simply said "here's why I'm 
>> not buying" and moved on.
>
> The programming language does not matter and the number of developers 
> does not matter. The quality of a product I potentially pay for 
> matters. If the quality, the reliability and the added value over 
> competitor products is worth the money then I am happy to pay let's 
> say 100 EUR. Neither the programming language nor the number of 
> developer is an excuse for such obvious flaws. And you don't have to 
> tell that I have no right for complaining about bugs. Obviously some 
> of you have problems taking issues seriously?
>
> -aj_______________________________________________
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate at lists.freron.com
> http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate